What does Baetens(2001) mean by ‘monstration’, ‘graphiation’ and ‘graphiateur’ ?
It was difficult to understand the exact meaning of threee words-‘monstration’, ‘graphiation’ and ‘graphiateur’. They were not familiar at all and not clear. So this week I just summaried their meaning from Baeton’s theory based on the fact that the distincion of graphiation, graphiateur, and monstration depends on acknowledging and identifying the graphic trace or index of the artist.
Graphiation is the graphic and narrative enunciation of the comics, and it is the persistence and visibility of features of the enunciative act in the graphic result of that act. Moreover, graphiation is at its strongest in a drawing that is in the stage of a rough copy or sketch.
Graphiateur is the agent or authority responsible for the comics’s drawing of both the letters and the images, but it is not the person in the flesh who signs the work, but an authority constructed by the reader. Marion’s graphiateur, however, remains rather monolithic, and it should be possible to go beyond this overly simple conception.
Monstraion is the one that is split from narrative enunciation in film by Gaudreault, and the concept of monstration cannot be transposed mechanically to the field of comics, since monstration in comics is far from having the same figurative transparency as in film. The very process of monstration tends to go unnoticed behind the figurative result, for instance, behind the strong analogical simulacrum it installs. But in the comics the graphic material(drawings and lettering) resists such a figurative transparency; it creates on the contrary a kin of persisting opacity and prevents the act of monstration form being fully transparent and transitive.
In addition, I would like to mention about Spiegelman’s work, ‘In the Shadow of no Towers’ , briefly.
Images and formats are irregular. There are more than one storyline and character on comics of ‘In the shadow of no Towers’. The main story is from the sensitive issue of 9/11 and some drawings are quite violent and brutal for chilren readers. (In fact, it is relatively a different style compared with ‘The adventure of Tintin’.) As a result, I felt like I read several comics at the same time. (Probably this may be the author’s intention.)
Reference
Baetons, J. (2001). Revealing Traces: a new theory of graphic enunciation. In Varnum, R. & Gibbons, C. (Eds.), The Language of Comics: word and image (pp.145-155). Jackson: U Press of Mississippi.
Spiegelman, A. (2004). The Sky is Falling. In In the Shadow of No Towers (pp. ii-iii). New York: Pantheon.